Reply
Thread Tools

jwilliamswku2

jwilliamswku2's Avatar

DefaultSlow the Advance vs Shellshocker

Why is a 7 point slow the advance better in every single way, cooldown, range, and damage vs a 50 point shellshocker? and since they are both elite you can't use them both. I think i wasted alot of ap.

evantide2

Because it isn't. Shellshocker can hit different sets of 5 enemies every .3s, can proc signet effects multiple times, and isn't wasted if your targets just happen to die inside the AOE, if there's more than 5 targets.

If you're just straight-up comparing a slow on only one set of enemies, then yes. Shellshocker is worse. That's why you don't pick shell shocker if there are only 5 beefy enemies instead of multiple rush waves.

Claretta2

The Venetian

Shellshocker also refreshes the hinder every channel effect I think, making it an 8 second or so hinder when you account for stacking immunity.

Also much easier to target and better for oncoming rushes. It's very reliable in Ankh 5 for this reason, whereas Slow the Advance can bounce off sometimes if a zombie doesn't get in the blast or the one hinder it applies bugs out.
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.